Have Muni write a doctor’s note when Munifail occurs

SF Appeal and everyone in San Francisco with a Twitter account reports on nearly systemwide service issues this morning.

And so Muni rider Kath decided to take matters into her own hands, so to speak:

Yes, I was late today — very late — despite leaving early in hopes of having time to grab a cup of coffee before work. And yes, it was Muni’s fault… it took 20 minutes to get from Castro to Van Ness (via metro tunnel), for starters. So, yes, I DID make them write me a late note when I finally got to Embarcadero station. I plan on doing this every time they make me late from now on. And I encourage you to do the same!

— Kath

PS: of course, the delay really started at 7.45A this morning, but for this first-time late note I’ll take what I can get.

Go, Kath!

BART Seats: Officially Gross


Photo by Jared Zimmerman

Muni seats: officially less gross. Well, at least on the molecular level.

Muni seats are cleaner than the cloth seats on BART, which carry bacteria resistant to antibiotics, the Bay Citizen reported yesterday. Citing laboratory tests of swabs from BART seats done by an SF State biologist, the Bay Citizen says the results showed several antibiotic-resistant bacteria strains living in the infamous blue cushioned seats.

In two separate tests, [SF State biology lab supervisor Darleen] Franklin identified characteristics of the MRSA bacteria growing in the seat. The first test confirmed the presence of staphylococcus aureus, the skin-borne bacteria. A second confirmed that the bacteria, like MRSA, was resistant to the antibiotics methicillin and penicillin. But a third test intended to isolate the MRSA bacteria was negative.

MRSA is known as the “superbug” because it is resistant to antibiotics. It infects people through open wounds, attacking the immune system; 19,000 deaths each year are related to MRSA infections, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

You might have read a couple of gross stories on Muni here (hell, we even have our own crowd-sourced dictionary of Muni aromas), but according to the Bay Citizen’s report, Muni seats are actually cleaner.

Franklin’s analysis also revealed that Muni, which uses acrylic plastic seats, appears to be more sanitary.

She tested a seat on the No. 28 bus, a route frequented by college students traveling from San Francisco State to Daly City. Two benign bacteria colonies were found. Unlike the BART seat analysis, Franklin’s test of the Muni seat after cleaning it with an alcohol wipe detected no bacteria.

Read the entire Bay Citizen article (“BART Seats: Where Bacteria Blossom“).

BART is asking what kind of seats riders want when the system upgrades its trains in the next few years. What do you propose?

Weekend Photos: On the Floor of Muni

Done With
Photo by CarbonNYC

As much as we want your eyeballs on this post, seriously get away from the computer right freaking now. It is amazingly springlike in San Francisco, and should be all weekend, including possible showers on Sunday.

Still with us? Okay. Earlier this week on Muni Time Capsule, Eric Fischer’s photo of an old streetcar dressed in cable car clothes, and on a street that was never part of a streetcar route, had some of us scratching our heads and admiring at the same time. Perplexing stuff.

Did you know that Muni Diaries has a Facebook page? If not, check it out and never be without your daily dose of Muni this and Muni that. We’re also on Twitter. Speaking of, this week saw the debut of a new MD feature: Meanwhile, on @munidiaries, where we’ll be compiling the best tweets and twitpics of the week every Thursday.

SF Appeal has details on this weekend’s Muni traffic advisory.

Here’s the week’s Muni news:

  • Muni drivers sleeping, speeding, snacking while operating trains, state agency says (SF Examiner)
  • We’re transportation innovators (SFGate)
  • Muni objects to state criticism of rail lines (SFGate)
  • Tab for Muni collision in West Portal Tunnel nears $6 million (SFGate’s City Insider)
  • Washington airport group makes no decision on hiring Nathaniel Ford (SF Examiner)
  • SFMTA Fires At Least Seven Employees for Ticket Fixing, Investigation Ongoing (SF Appeal)
  • SFMTA Board Votes to Give 12,000 Free Muni Passes to Low-Income Students (BCN via SF Appeal)
  • SFMTA: Local Hire Will Kill Central Subway Project (SF Appeal)
  • Muni N-Judah train strikes car that ran stop sign (SF Examiner || SF Appeal)
  • CPUC leaders absent from Muni’s hearing on regulation infractions (SF Examiner)
  • Muni operators accuse agency of ignoring safety protocols (SF Examiner)
  • Cameron Beach and Jerry Lee’s Future as SFMTA Board Members Uncertain (Streetsblog SF)

What are you up to this weekend? Whatever it is, enjoy!


Photo by Keisuke Omi

OMG, shoes
Photo by WarzauWynn

Monte Carlo
Photo by eviloars, via the new-look Mission Mission

14 Mission
Photo by Brandi666

Police activity on the T-Third

@caltraindiaries Twitstress (?) Laura O. sends the following report, which she estimates took place a little after 1 p.m.:

Was walking back from lunch and saw a flurry of cop cars. Roughly 6 cars, two motorcycles and the weird four wheel drive white car zoomed down 4th, past Caltrain and surrounded a T car that was idle at the station.

Literally they surrounded it — it was crazy. Passengers streamed off, and we hurried over to take a look. Looks like two guys got in a fight; one was arrested, the other just walked away. All in all I’d guess that there were 15 + cops.

Also, the T was then sent back to Dogpatch; wasn’t allowed to continue on its normal route.

Anyone know what is or was going on? If the guys were just fighting, why was one allowed to “just walk away”?

‘Breaking News:’ Results of the ResetSF Muni Survey


Source: ResetSF

BREAKING NEWS: most riders aren’t satisfied with Muni, but aren’t sure where SFMTA will find the money to improve it.

This is according to a survey by Assessor Recorder Phil Ting (who is also in the running for mayor). His website, ResetSF, sent out a survey to “1700 San Francisco voters with email addresses” and was conducted from Feb. 25 to March 1. Last week, some of you told us that you received an email survey about Muni, and some people on Twitter even thought that SFMTA sent the survey.

We asked ResetSF about their methodology and here’s what they told us:

“The survey was sent to every registered voter in San Francisco for whom we have voter file. The total is about 100,000 in that category – and in the week the survey was out more than 1750 completed it.”

ResetSF says this is a “pretty good representation of San Franciscans with emails who are fluent in English” (the survey was only conducted in English), but ResetSF folks said they “don’t really have reason to think there is much difference when it comes to the MUNI.” Because the survey was online, it skews toward younger respondents.

More about the demographic of the respondents:

49% male, 47% female (balance refused to answer).

67% straight, 20 LGBT or Bi.

61% White, 12% Asian, 5% Latino, 3% African American.

77% under age 50 and 33% over age 50.

So there’ s your grain of salt.

In their quick poll, Phil Ting/ResetSF found the unsurprising fact that most people don’t have a great impression of Muni:

Just 7% of people have a “very favorable” impression of MUNI with 24% reporting “very unfavorable.” Overall, 44% of the respondents to the online poll had a very or somewhat favorable opinion of MUNI, while 56% had a somewhat or very negative impression of the San Francisco Municipal Railway.

And people can’t agree on how to raise funds to fix Muni. ResetSF’s survey respondents don’t want transportation utility fees, parking tax, or more parking tickets. So I guess we’re back to where we were before — nobody likes the way things are, and nobody knows where to get the money to fix the things we don’t like. Hmm.

Details of the Reset SF Muni Survey.

Muni operator asleep at the … automatic controls

Castro Tunnel
Photo by Timmy

Just a few days after reports of the California Public Utilities Commission lodged allegations of Muni’s worn tracks and faulty equipment, the San Francisco Examiner delves further into the CPUC’s report to find “human error”-type infractions. From the Examiner’s story:

Many of the violations discovered by CPUC inspectors involve worn tracks, exposed wires, malfunctioning emergency phones and overgrown vegetation along the tracks, while a handful involve apparent human error.

On April 26, a state inspector observed an operator whose train was on automatic “closing his eyes while the train was moving.”

“The operator appeared to be asleep,” the inspection report said. “The operator had his right leg extended up on the trash can and his left arm was leaning on the left side of the control console. The operators head was resting in his left hand, while his eyes where closed and his mouth was open [sic].”

Other issues include speeding in a school zone, deboarding to buy snacks (something we’re all too familiar with here), and reading the paper while the LRV was operating under automatic control “an inspector observed a train operator whose cab had a number of newspapers in plain view. While the inspector did not see the operator reading the papers, the appearance was ‘that at some time during his shift he was being distracted by the news articles.'”

Read more at the Examiner.

1 179 180 181 182 183 257